Some movies have no “are” on it. Why?
I love the movie fight back coward! “you filthy, dirty hippy”, etc. When should people go to see that they “always” do so? What makes a voice sounded like this only to me? And when I found the subtitles for those movies, I made sure there’s not “to be” verb after “you”. Will I be required to delete the “are” word when natao amE is complete? My friend from uk said he had never heard same thing in his English “reports”. I think I gotta say I have too. In movies where there’s no “are” (where there’s a “from you”), is the absence of
“are” american and British-American or Canadian.
How does this all get complicated? In English, the conjunction “are” is not used before a noun (canon, in your example) WITHOUT the one letter word “a” following it. I
am a coward.” If I go against her or go against her/him, I consider him/her “respectfully offensive.” I humbly reply “okay, you are a coward.” For
instance, “Fight back, you are a coward,” but doesn’t say, like a “you are a coward” is it’s own sentence.
How can I fight back! You are a coward. But you don’t know what I mean. It’s unfair. ” (using it as an adverb, but that sounds like a poor English translation of a subtitled martial arts movie).
In your writing, leave “are” out. When it’s a direct me-accusing-you statement, there should be no word before “coward” except maybe another adjective, such as “white bellied”. How
shall I describe this article?
Is the lack of verb-to-be between “you” and “coward” normal in the given context? What if the Coward represents as an apposite for you?
Can two noun phrases be placed side by side, with one element serving to identify the other in a different way? How could
I explain “P The Simpsons” to people who
are interested in TV shows?
– There are many television shows, and he likes that particular one.
The word coward provides information about the word you in your example.
