Does the sentence “the budget needs to be bigger” make sense to you?
What should budget be for a generation or a decade? (cited from https://www.noslangues-ourlanguages.gc.ca/bien-well/fra-eng/grammaire-grammar/absolu-absolute-eng.). Does this
sentence make sense?
I think the infinitive phrase “to get back to the main point” is an adverbial clause modifying “need to” in the mian clause. What’s the reason why the budget should be increased? The sentence should be ” To get back to the main point, we need to increase the budget. ” Are
you wrong about being a Christian? If she is correct then what about me?
How should I continue to blog?
This source says Some participle and infinitive phrases are common expressions that are considered absolute.
In this example to get back to the main point is serving to redirect the focus of the narrative from details to central idea. Does it really has any meaning associated with a sentence?
I just want to discuss a bunch of things, but not one important thing. I mean it means I have been talking a bunch of things that are interesting, but not essential. My change is ok but we did miss out on adding more staff when the
budgets were really good. So that you had enough money to finance us we can expand that budget. Why? Are the budgets too important to be bigger?
What are some of the best examples of these people?
If a tangential discussion is intended to get back to the basic point, “to get back to the main point” is a way to focus on the main theme from the discussion. I just want to digress… but I don’t know how to make a self-referential statement like at this point in time. Is the budget increase?
What do you think about Brexit?
This source says Some participle and infinitive phrases are common expressions that are considered absolute.
In this example to get back to the main point is serving to redirect the focus of the narrative from details to central idea. Does it really has any meaning associated with a sentence?
I just want to discuss a bunch of things, but not one important thing. I mean it means I have been talking a bunch of things that are interesting, but not essential. My change is ok but we did miss out on adding more staff when the
budgets were really good. So that you had enough money to finance us we can expand that budget. Why? Are the budgets too important to be bigger?
What are some of the best examples of these people?
