What would you like to achieve? Could you give me more information? Why did you downvote your question?

In my opinion, the last three words in “Joan Smith” sound weird. What part do you mean?

Intension I am inferring that you are the writer of the sentence and you’d like to make it more readable and persuasive. Further implying that it’s important set emphasis on shit. I think the

whole sentence sounds weird because of duplicate words and too much emphasis. So lets see that… Everyone, everywhere sounds a little bumpy

and if you take it deeper in your notes a little bit, where did you fall and why? What’s a good way to make sure everyone sounds fluent?

pylonasm is the term for the deluge of the tsunami: a strong force is created by the tsunami. Can deluge of the be removed without substitution, at times it can set priority. But the problem with this part is that that and is each showing up twice in close succession: “in

the deluge of the tsunami of shit”.

Assuming you remove deluge of the completely. I would suggest to remove deluge of the completely.

We let rage grow rampant. The words rampant and rage, although not pleonasm, they mean the same. Here again, it can set emphasis. As a rule neither two words can be highlighted in the same sentence. So I would drop the rage or replace rage rampant with only loose. Could we say that "now everybody has been caught

up in the tsunami “? Or a combination

of that and we let loose so rampantly At the end of the sentence would look like: Everyone from everywhere would drown, everyone can catch the tsunami of shit that we let loose so rampantly!

What are better educational options when you don’t know about psychology.?

What would you like to achieve? Could you give me more information? Why did you downvote your question?

In my opinion, the last three words in “Joan Smith” sound weird. What part do you mean?

Intension I am inferring that you are the writer of the sentence and you’d like to make it more readable and persuasive. Further implying that it’s important set emphasis on shit. I think the

whole sentence sounds weird because of duplicate words and too much emphasis. So lets see that… Everyone, everywhere sounds a little bumpy

and if you take it deeper in your notes a little bit, where did you fall and why? What’s a good way to make sure everyone sounds fluent?

pylonasm is the term for the deluge of the tsunami: a strong force is created by the tsunami. Can deluge of the be removed without substitution, at times it can set priority. But the problem with this part is that that and is each showing up twice in close succession: “in

the deluge of the tsunami of shit”.

Assuming you remove deluge of the completely. I would suggest to remove deluge of the completely.

We let rage grow rampant. The words rampant and rage, although not pleonasm, they mean the same. Here again, it can set emphasis. As a rule neither two words can be highlighted in the same sentence. So I would drop the rage or replace rage rampant with only loose. Could we say that "now everybody has been caught

up in the tsunami “? Or a combination

of that and we let loose so rampantly At the end of the sentence would look like: Everyone from everywhere would drown, everyone can catch the tsunami of shit that we let loose so rampantly!

What are better educational options when you don’t know about psychology.?