Some languages are more infected than English (English). What is the answer to your question “Why”? This is simply how the English language developed. You can trace similarities between English and Germanic languages, and you can look at the history of the language as influenced by political and social factors over time. How do the Normans speak English fluently? How did they communicate so quickly when the English language had become plain?

Do pronouns have inflected forms? “It” is so many things when there is no subject but an object in it. In practice, this means it is as much as a subject.

What extra information is communicated by expressing object / subject?

I can’t think of a case right now where you would use the extra information outside of poetry. The she I despise. He that I despise.

What is the biggest obstacle that people face with their lives?

I will post separate answer that applies to duplicate information in a language in general. In pretty much all sentences, there are parts that could be left out without making the sentence unintelligible, because there are many clues that point to the same interpretation.

It was like my father killed me. I had to kill him both.

I killed him and he killed my father. How could he have succeeded in destroying me?

That the because-clause would indicate the motive for killing “him” is clear even without the word “because”, because it can be inferred from context that this must be the motive with reasonable probability. What makes sentences two-literal? I think this sentence is the easiest to understand. Any aspect of a sentence can be a clue: word order, case, the choice of one word over another, the addition of adjectives and adverbs, expressing the agent of a verb instead of using a passive form, etc. , etc. Is it illegal to, “go around it” for, etc. If it is, why should anyone die? -and in the context of the sentence or in the real world there are always clues so that you and your eyes will never be blind.

Is “because” actually a burden that should be cut out for efficiency? According to audio, sometimes the

1. listener misses part of a sentence because the audio is distracted or noised or unnatural. But no. There are two reasons. In addition, the speaker could make a small mistake or be a bit unclear One can “eliminate” ambiguity by reading multiple clues in the same time. (p. 6), “duplicate” clues are a great instrument for the listener to repair these lapses of information. Especially long sentences with many clauses take a toll on the listener’s attention in which case he will be happy with extra clues.

2. Even when the listener does not need to make any repairs to what he hears, it takes less effort to understand a sentence if one has several clues. Conciseness can be a taxing experience. I can tell all the more intelligent words that a listener can say explicitly. I know many, but the one that goes out of his/her way in the words.

How do I get an exclusive quote on the video?