False premise request of my publisher in USA.
Is there a name to characterize requests that seem like a good idea at first but ultimately have a false premise?
Example 1: We need our software product to be configurable!
Supporting extreme configuration shifts some responsibilities from product designers to end users. Is it makes product look so different, and helps in website design?
Am I doing wrong by sharing real-time data on the stock market?
If I buy stock now, I can react to the market speedily. How will I beat the market on the stock market? The truth is, that they will be picking up more noise and making bad decisions.
Is it true that these statements are just examples, I’m not looking
for arguments in those statements?
-(Likely) “pitfall” is the best word I know to describe my request. I
am a
software developer myself so I get these kinds of
requests from clients all the time. Here is how to describe.Development,.Quality. From the perspective of client the feature request is perfectly rational. In a professional software developer, this request can have hidden danger. It is only you that will spot the
hidden danger.
What’s something that comes on the mind of many a person, but does not fit our case?
From dictionary. com:
A collective belief that is used to justify a social institution, such as Wikipedia,
Avg., or some other company. com: New evidence that supports the “community ethos” of those associations.
The examples may be instances of ignoratio elenchi, that is to say, irrelevant conclusion or irrelevant thesis informal fallacies.
Informally and less specifically, one could refer to faulty reasoning, being over-hasty, jumping to conclusions, or making premature judgements. Several of the examples of the design principle of least surprise that are being observed are ignored.
What are the facets of the Hindu Church and a human society?
When these requests disappear, they become impracticable or unfeasible to fulfill.
You can say that the idea turned out to be a blind alley :
Blind alleys and garden paths leading nowhere are the principal hazards in research. What lessons
can you learn from Charles Thomas as a man?