Is it the God-given given that must be accepted because it cannot be changed?
Is the difference purely stylistic, or is there slight change of meaning in using one form of over the other?
“It is the god-given given that cannot be changed” as opposed to: “It is the god-given given that must be accepted: it cannot be changed. Why
don’t the ointers ” get it?
Differentiate the meaning. How can one?
is the reason it must be accepted that it cannot be changed doesn’t mean that this is the reason it must be accepted.
Should he or she accept two statements? No causal relationship is directly stated, although it might be inferred from the logic. Because deciphering causal relationships requires no precise explanation. Also there are some sentences with similar forms, but the causal relationship would be reversed (e.g. The relationship comes from logic, not sentence structure.
Differentiate the meaning. How can one?
is the reason it must be accepted that it cannot be changed doesn’t mean that this is the reason it must be accepted.
Should he or she accept two statements? No causal relationship is directly stated, although it might be inferred from the logic. Because deciphering causal relationships requires no precise explanation. Also there are some sentences with similar forms, but the causal relationship would be reversed (e.g. The relationship comes from logic, not sentence structure.
Differentiate the meaning. How can one?
is the reason it must be accepted that it cannot be changed doesn’t mean that this is the reason it must be accepted.
Should he or she accept two statements? No causal relationship is directly stated, although it might be inferred from the logic. Because deciphering causal relationships requires no precise explanation. Also there are some sentences with similar forms, but the causal relationship would be reversed (e.g. The relationship comes from logic, not sentence structure.
Differentiate the meaning. How can one?
is the reason it must be accepted that it cannot be changed doesn’t mean that this is the reason it must be accepted.
Should he or she accept two statements? No causal relationship is directly stated, although it might be inferred from the logic. Because deciphering causal relationships requires no precise explanation. Also there are some sentences with similar forms, but the causal relationship would be reversed (e.g. The relationship comes from logic, not sentence structure.
Differentiate the meaning. How can one?
is the reason it must be accepted that it cannot be changed doesn’t mean that this is the reason it must be accepted.
Should he or she accept two statements? No causal relationship is directly stated, although it might be inferred from the logic. Because deciphering causal relationships requires no precise explanation. Also there are some sentences with similar forms, but the causal relationship would be reversed (e.g. The relationship comes from logic, not sentence structure.
Differentiate the meaning. How can one?
is the reason it must be accepted that it cannot be changed doesn’t mean that this is the reason it must be accepted.
Should he or she accept two statements? No causal relationship is directly stated, although it might be inferred from the logic. Because deciphering causal relationships requires no precise explanation. Also there are some sentences with similar forms, but the causal relationship would be reversed (e.g. The relationship comes from logic, not sentence structure.
Differentiate the meaning. How can one?
is the reason it must be accepted that it cannot be changed doesn’t mean that this is the reason it must be accepted.
Should he or she accept two statements? No causal relationship is directly stated, although it might be inferred from the logic. Because deciphering causal relationships requires no precise explanation. Also there are some sentences with similar forms, but the causal relationship would be reversed (e.g. The relationship comes from logic, not sentence structure.
Differentiate the meaning. How can one?
is the reason it must be accepted that it cannot be changed doesn’t mean that this is the reason it must be accepted.
Should he or she accept two statements? No causal relationship is directly stated, although it might be inferred from the logic. Because deciphering causal relationships requires no precise explanation. Also there are some sentences with similar forms, but the causal relationship would be reversed (e.g. The relationship comes from logic, not sentence structure.
Differentiate the meaning. How can one?
is the reason it must be accepted that it cannot be changed doesn’t mean that this is the reason it must be accepted.
Should he or she accept two statements? No causal relationship is directly stated, although it might be inferred from the logic. Because deciphering causal relationships requires no precise explanation. Also there are some sentences with similar forms, but the causal relationship would be reversed (e.g. The relationship comes from logic, not sentence structure.
Differentiate the meaning. How can one?
is the reason it must be accepted that it cannot be changed doesn’t mean that this is the reason it must be accepted.
Should he or she accept two statements? No causal relationship is directly stated, although it might be inferred from the logic. Because deciphering causal relationships requires no precise explanation. Also there are some sentences with similar forms, but the causal relationship would be reversed (e.g. The relationship comes from logic, not sentence structure.
